C&C 27 Mk V vs Finn 26
How do the C&C 27 Mk V and Finn 26 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
C&C 27 Mk V 
Finn 26 | C&C 27 Mk V | Finn 26 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 26.5 ft8.08 m | 26.5 ft8.07 m |
| Waterline length | 23.0 ft7.01 m | 20.3 ft6.20 m |
| Beam | 9.3 ft2.82 m | 9.2 ft2.80 m |
| Draft | 4.8 ft1.46 m | 4.6 ft1.40 m |
| Displacement | 4,420 lb2,005 kg | 5,071 lb2,300 kg |
| Ballast | 1,715 lb778 kg | 1,984 lb900 kg |
| Sail area | 343 ft²31.9 m² | 409 ft²38.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 20.38 | 22.17 |
| Displacement / Length | 162 | 269 |
| Comfort ratio | 14.7 | 18.4 |
| Capsize screening | 2.25 | 2.14 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.4 | 6.0 |
| Average used price | — | €6,100 |
C&C 27 Mk V vs Finn 26: the short version
- The C&C 27 Mk V and Finn 26 are close in length (26.5 ft8.08 m vs 26.5 ft8.07 m ).
- The Finn 26 is heavier, displacing about 15% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Finn 26 carries the more powerful rig (22.2 vs 20.4), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Finn 26 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Finn 26 rates better for offshore work (2.14 vs 2.25).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.