C&C 30 Redwing vs Nonsuch 30
How do the C&C 30 Redwing and Nonsuch 30 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
C&C 30 Redwing 
Nonsuch 30 | C&C 30 Redwing | Nonsuch 30 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 30.3 ft9.22 m | 30.3 ft9.24 m |
| Waterline length | 21.8 ft6.63 m | 28.8 ft8.76 m |
| Beam | 8.8 ft2.67 m | 11.9 ft3.63 m |
| Draft | 4.5 ft1.37 m | 5.0 ft1.52 m |
| Displacement | 7,650 lb3,470 kg | 10,500 lb4,763 kg |
| Ballast | 3,530 lb1,601 kg | 4,500 lb2,041 kg |
| Sail area | 395 ft²36.7 m² | 540 ft²50.2 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 16.28 | 18.02 |
| Displacement / Length | 332 | 197 |
| Comfort ratio | 27.1 | 20.5 |
| Capsize screening | 1.78 | 2.18 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.2 | 7.2 |
C&C 30 Redwing vs Nonsuch 30: the short version
- The C&C 30 Redwing and Nonsuch 30 are close in length (30.3 ft9.22 m vs 30.3 ft9.24 m ).
- The Nonsuch 30 is heavier, displacing about 37% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Nonsuch 30 carries the more powerful rig (18.0 vs 16.3), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The C&C 30 Redwing scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the C&C 30 Redwing rates better for offshore work (1.78 vs 2.18).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.