C&C 36R vs Express 35
How do the C&C 36R and Express 35 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
C&C 36R 
Express 35 | C&C 36R | Express 35 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 35.1 ft10.69 m | 35.0 ft10.67 m |
| Waterline length | 30.5 ft9.30 m | 29.0 ft8.84 m |
| Beam | 11.2 ft3.40 m | 11.5 ft3.51 m |
| Draft | 6.0 ft1.83 m | 6.5 ft1.98 m |
| Displacement | 12,700 lb5,761 kg | 11,500 lb5,216 kg |
| Ballast | 6,030 lb2,735 kg | 5,300 lb2,404 kg |
| Sail area | 632 ft²58.7 m² | 656 ft²60.9 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 18.58 | 20.60 |
| Displacement / Length | 200 | 211 |
| Comfort ratio | 24.7 | 22.3 |
| Capsize screening | 1.92 | 2.04 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.4 | 7.2 |
C&C 36R vs Express 35: the short version
- The C&C 36R and Express 35 are close in length (35.1 ft10.69 m vs 35.0 ft10.67 m ).
- The C&C 36R is heavier, displacing about 10% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Express 35 carries the more powerful rig (20.6 vs 18.6), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The C&C 36R scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the C&C 36R rates better for offshore work (1.92 vs 2.04).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.