C&C 43-1 vs Gulfstar 43
How do the C&C 43-1 and Gulfstar 43 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
C&C 43-1 
Gulfstar 43 | C&C 43-1 | Gulfstar 43 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 43.3 ft13.21 m | 43.3 ft13.21 m |
| Waterline length | 35.0 ft10.67 m | 39.2 ft11.94 m |
| Beam | 12.8 ft3.91 m | 11.9 ft3.63 m |
| Draft | 7.0 ft2.13 m | 3.5 ft1.07 m |
| Displacement | 21,314 lb9,668 kg | 21,000 lb9,525 kg |
| Ballast | 9,980 lb4,527 kg | 5,000 lb2,268 kg |
| Sail area | 901 ft²83.7 m² | 664 ft²61.7 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 18.75 | 13.96 |
| Displacement / Length | 222 | 156 |
| Comfort ratio | 29.4 | 29.6 |
| Capsize screening | 1.85 | 1.73 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.9 | 8.4 |
C&C 43-1 vs Gulfstar 43: the short version
- The C&C 43-1 and Gulfstar 43 are close in length (43.3 ft13.21 m vs 43.3 ft13.21 m ).
- On sail area/displacement the C&C 43-1 carries the more powerful rig (18.8 vs 14.0), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Gulfstar 43 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Gulfstar 43 rates better for offshore work (1.73 vs 1.85).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.