C&C 50 vs Orion 50
How do the C&C 50 and Orion 50 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
C&C 50 | C&C 50 | Orion 50 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 49.8 ft15.19 m | 49.5 ft15.09 m |
| Waterline length | 39.0 ft11.89 m | 42.5 ft12.95 m |
| Beam | 14.5 ft4.42 m | 14.5 ft4.42 m |
| Draft | 8.0 ft2.44 m | 6.5 ft1.98 m |
| Displacement | 31,100 lb14,107 kg | 36,599 lb16,601 kg |
| Ballast | 15,000 lb6,804 kg | 14,000 lb6,350 kg |
| Sail area | 1,273 ft²118.3 m² | 1,119 ft²104.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 20.60 | 16.24 |
| Displacement / Length | 234 | 213 |
| Comfort ratio | 32.3 | 36.0 |
| Capsize screening | 1.84 | 1.75 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 8.4 | 8.7 |
C&C 50 vs Orion 50: the short version
- The C&C 50 and Orion 50 are close in length (49.8 ft15.19 m vs 49.5 ft15.09 m ).
- The Orion 50 is heavier, displacing about 18% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the C&C 50 carries the more powerful rig (20.6 vs 16.2), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Orion 50 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Orion 50 rates better for offshore work (1.75 vs 1.84).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.