C&C Custom 62 vs C&C Custom 67
How do the C&C Custom 62 and C&C Custom 67 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
C&C Custom 62 
C&C Custom 67 | C&C Custom 62 | C&C Custom 67 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 62.1 ft18.93 m | 73.0 ft22.25 m |
| Waterline length | 52.8 ft16.09 m | 58.0 ft17.68 m |
| Beam | 15.2 ft4.63 m | 18.3 ft5.59 m |
| Draft | 6.5 ft1.98 m | 10.5 ft3.20 m |
| Displacement | 65,000 lb29,484 kg | 98,700 lb44,770 kg |
| Ballast | 26,000 lb11,793 kg | 35,274 lb16,000 kg |
| Sail area | 1,593 ft²148.0 m² | 2,860 ft²265.7 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 15.77 | 21.43 |
| Displacement / Length | 197 | 226 |
| Comfort ratio | 48.2 | 50.8 |
| Capsize screening | 1.51 | 1.59 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 9.7 | 10.2 |
C&C Custom 62 vs C&C Custom 67: the short version
- The C&C Custom 67 is the larger boat at 73.0 ft22.25 m LOA versus 62.1 ft18.93 m for the C&C Custom 62.
- The C&C Custom 67 is heavier, displacing about 52% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the C&C Custom 67 carries the more powerful rig (21.4 vs 15.8), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The C&C Custom 67 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the C&C Custom 62 rates better for offshore work (1.51 vs 1.59).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.