ClubSwan 50 vs Swan 55
How do the ClubSwan 50 and Swan 55 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
ClubSwan 50 
Swan 55 | ClubSwan 50 | Swan 55 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 54.9 ft16.74 m | 54.6 ft16.65 m |
| Waterline length | 45.9 ft14.00 m | 38.5 ft11.73 m |
| Beam | 13.8 ft4.20 m | 14.2 ft4.33 m |
| Draft | 11.5 ft3.50 m | 8.5 ft2.60 m |
| Displacement | 18,739 lb8,500 kg | 45,636 lb20,700 kg |
| Ballast | 7,605 lb3,450 kg | 17,000 lb7,711 kg |
| Sail area | 1,700 ft²157.9 m² | 1,277 ft²118.6 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 38.55 | 16.00 |
| Displacement / Length | 86 | 358 |
| Comfort ratio | 18.1 | 47.5 |
| Capsize screening | 2.08 | 1.59 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 9.1 | 8.3 |
ClubSwan 50 vs Swan 55: the short version
- The ClubSwan 50 and Swan 55 are close in length (54.9 ft16.74 m vs 54.6 ft16.65 m ).
- The Swan 55 is heavier, displacing about 144% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the ClubSwan 50 carries the more powerful rig (38.6 vs 16.0), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Swan 55 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Swan 55 rates better for offshore work (1.59 vs 2.08).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.