Columbia 22 vs Columbia T-23
How do the Columbia 22 and Columbia T-23 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Columbia 22 | Columbia 22 | Columbia T-23 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 22.0 ft6.71 m | 22.6 ft6.88 m |
| Waterline length | 20.1 ft6.12 m | 20.0 ft6.10 m |
| Beam | 7.8 ft2.36 m | 7.9 ft2.41 m |
| Draft | 3.2 ft0.97 m | 1.1 ft0.33 m |
| Displacement | 2,200 lb998 kg | 2,300 lb1,043 kg |
| Ballast | 1,100 lb499 kg | 810 lb367 kg |
| Sail area | 232 ft²21.6 m² | 218 ft²20.3 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 21.94 | 20.02 |
| Displacement / Length | 121 | 128 |
| Comfort ratio | 10.8 | 10.9 |
| Capsize screening | 2.38 | 2.40 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.0 | 6.0 |
Columbia 22 vs Columbia T-23: the short version
- The Columbia T-23 is the larger boat at 22.6 ft6.88 m LOA versus 22.0 ft6.71 m for the Columbia 22.
- On sail area/displacement the Columbia 22 carries the more powerful rig (21.9 vs 20.0), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Columbia T-23 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Columbia 22 rates better for offshore work (2.38 vs 2.40).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.