Columbia 34 vs Creekmore 34
How do the Columbia 34 and Creekmore 34 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Columbia 34 | Columbia 34 | Creekmore 34 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 34.0 ft10.36 m | 34.0 ft10.36 m |
| Waterline length | 23.6 ft7.19 m | 29.5 ft8.99 m |
| Beam | 9.9 ft3.02 m | 11.5 ft3.51 m |
| Draft | 8.0 ft2.44 m | 4.9 ft1.49 m |
| Displacement | 10,500 lb4,763 kg | 17,000 lb7,711 kg |
| Ballast | 4,200 lb1,905 kg | 7,000 lb3,175 kg |
| Sail area | 466 ft²43.3 m² | 589 ft²54.7 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 15.55 | 14.25 |
| Displacement / Length | 358 | 296 |
| Comfort ratio | 28.6 | 32.9 |
| Capsize screening | 1.81 | 1.79 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.5 | 7.3 |
Columbia 34 vs Creekmore 34: the short version
- The Columbia 34 and Creekmore 34 are close in length (34.0 ft10.36 m vs 34.0 ft10.36 m ).
- The Creekmore 34 is heavier, displacing about 62% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Columbia 34 carries the more powerful rig (15.5 vs 14.3), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Creekmore 34 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Creekmore 34 rates better for offshore work (1.79 vs 1.81).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.