Columbia 36 vs Pilot 35
How do the Columbia 36 and Pilot 35 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Columbia 36 | Columbia 36 | Pilot 35 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 35.8 ft10.90 m | 35.8 ft10.90 m |
| Waterline length | 27.8 ft8.46 m | 25.0 ft7.62 m |
| Beam | 10.5 ft3.20 m | 9.5 ft2.90 m |
| Draft | 5.4 ft1.65 m | 5.0 ft1.52 m |
| Displacement | 12,000 lb5,443 kg | 13,700 lb6,214 kg |
| Ballast | 5,000 lb2,268 kg | 4,600 lb2,087 kg |
| Sail area | 556 ft²51.7 m² | 550 ft²51.1 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 16.97 | 15.37 |
| Displacement / Length | 251 | 391 |
| Comfort ratio | 26.8 | 37.4 |
| Capsize screening | 1.83 | 1.59 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.1 | 6.7 |
Columbia 36 vs Pilot 35: the short version
- The Columbia 36 and Pilot 35 are close in length (35.8 ft10.90 m vs 35.8 ft10.90 m ).
- The Pilot 35 is heavier, displacing about 14% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Columbia 36 carries the more powerful rig (17.0 vs 15.4), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Pilot 35 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Pilot 35 rates better for offshore work (1.59 vs 1.83).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.