Comfortina 32 vs Corvette 31
How do the Comfortina 32 and Corvette 31 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Comfortina 32 
Corvette 31 | Comfortina 32 | Corvette 31 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 31.2 ft9.50 m | 31.2 ft9.50 m |
| Waterline length | 24.0 ft7.32 m | 22.5 ft6.86 m |
| Beam | 10.7 ft3.27 m | 9.1 ft2.77 m |
| Draft | 5.6 ft1.70 m | 7.0 ft2.13 m |
| Displacement | 9,921 lb4,500 kg | 8,545 lb3,876 kg |
| Ballast | 3,968 lb1,800 kg | 4,000 lb1,814 kg |
| Sail area | 646 ft²60.0 m² | 444 ft²41.2 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 22.39 | 17.00 |
| Displacement / Length | 320 | 335 |
| Comfort ratio | 24.8 | 27.9 |
| Capsize screening | 2.00 | 1.78 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.6 | 6.4 |
| Average used price | €29,000 | — |
Comfortina 32 vs Corvette 31: the short version
- The Comfortina 32 and Corvette 31 are close in length (31.2 ft9.50 m vs 31.2 ft9.50 m ).
- The Comfortina 32 is heavier, displacing about 16% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Comfortina 32 carries the more powerful rig (22.4 vs 17.0), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Corvette 31 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Corvette 31 rates better for offshore work (1.78 vs 2.00).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.