Compis 28 vs Marieholm 28 (281)
How do the Compis 28 and Marieholm 28 (281) compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Compis 28 | Compis 28 | Marieholm 28 (281) | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 28.1 ft8.56 m | 28.1 ft8.56 m |
| Waterline length | 23.3 ft7.10 m | 23.6 ft7.20 m |
| Beam | 9.3 ft2.84 m | 9.7 ft2.94 m |
| Draft | 5.0 ft1.51 m | 4.9 ft1.50 m |
| Displacement | 6,614 lb3,000 kg | 8,378 lb3,800 kg |
| Ballast | 2,976 lb1,350 kg | 3,417 lb1,550 kg |
| Sail area | 474 ft²44.0 m² | 452 ft²42.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 21.52 | 17.53 |
| Displacement / Length | 234 | 284 |
| Comfort ratio | 21.1 | 25.3 |
| Capsize screening | 1.99 | 1.90 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.5 | 6.5 |
| Average used price | €5,500 | €9,800 |
Compis 28 vs Marieholm 28 (281): the short version
- The Compis 28 and Marieholm 28 (281) are close in length (28.1 ft8.56 m vs 28.1 ft8.56 m ).
- The Marieholm 28 (281) is heavier, displacing about 27% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Compis 28 carries the more powerful rig (21.5 vs 17.5), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Marieholm 28 (281) scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Marieholm 28 (281) rates better for offshore work (1.90 vs 1.99).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.