CS 22 vs CS 27
How do the CS 22 and CS 27 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
CS 22 
CS 27 | CS 22 | CS 27 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 21.6 ft6.58 m | 27.0 ft8.23 m |
| Waterline length | 17.5 ft5.33 m | 23.9 ft7.29 m |
| Beam | 8.0 ft2.44 m | 9.3 ft2.84 m |
| Draft | 5.0 ft1.52 m | 5.2 ft1.58 m |
| Displacement | 2,200 lb998 kg | 6,100 lb2,767 kg |
| Ballast | 1,100 lb499 kg | 2,400 lb1,089 kg |
| Sail area | 194 ft²18.0 m² | 341 ft²31.7 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 18.35 | 16.34 |
| Displacement / Length | 183 | 199 |
| Comfort ratio | 11.4 | 19.4 |
| Capsize screening | 2.46 | 2.04 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.6 | 6.6 |
CS 22 vs CS 27: the short version
- The CS 27 is the larger boat at 27.0 ft8.23 m LOA versus 21.6 ft6.58 m for the CS 22.
- The CS 27 is heavier, displacing about 177% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the CS 22 carries the more powerful rig (18.4 vs 16.3), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The CS 27 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the CS 27 rates better for offshore work (2.04 vs 2.46).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.