CS 44 vs Kalik 44
How do the CS 44 and Kalik 44 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
CS 44 | CS 44 | Kalik 44 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 44.1 ft13.44 m | 44.0 ft13.41 m |
| Waterline length | 34.7 ft10.57 m | 37.1 ft11.30 m |
| Beam | 13.7 ft4.17 m | 13.8 ft4.19 m |
| Draft | 8.2 ft2.49 m | 6.5 ft1.98 m |
| Displacement | 22,000 lb9,979 kg | 25,000 lb11,340 kg |
| Ballast | 9,000 lb4,082 kg | 10,600 lb4,808 kg |
| Sail area | 970 ft²90.1 m² | 913 ft²84.8 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 19.77 | 17.09 |
| Displacement / Length | 236 | 219 |
| Comfort ratio | 27.9 | 30.1 |
| Capsize screening | 1.95 | 1.88 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.9 | 8.2 |
CS 44 vs Kalik 44: the short version
- The CS 44 and Kalik 44 are close in length (44.1 ft13.44 m vs 44.0 ft13.41 m ).
- The Kalik 44 is heavier, displacing about 14% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the CS 44 carries the more powerful rig (19.8 vs 17.1), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Kalik 44 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Kalik 44 rates better for offshore work (1.88 vs 1.95).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.