Dickerson 37 vs Dickerson 41
How do the Dickerson 37 and Dickerson 41 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Dickerson 37 | Dickerson 37 | Dickerson 41 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 37.0 ft11.28 m | 41.0 ft12.50 m |
| Waterline length | 28.8 ft8.79 m | 31.5 ft9.60 m |
| Beam | 11.5 ft3.51 m | 12.5 ft3.81 m |
| Draft | 4.5 ft1.37 m | 4.5 ft1.37 m |
| Displacement | 15,950 lb7,235 kg | 24,500 lb11,113 kg |
| Ballast | 5,850 lb2,654 kg | 8,500 lb3,856 kg |
| Sail area | 556 ft²51.7 m² | 753 ft²70.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 14.04 | 14.28 |
| Displacement / Length | 297 | 350 |
| Comfort ratio | 30.5 | 38.1 |
| Capsize screening | 1.83 | 1.72 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.2 | 7.5 |
Dickerson 37 vs Dickerson 41: the short version
- The Dickerson 41 is the larger boat at 41.0 ft12.50 m LOA versus 37.0 ft11.28 m for the Dickerson 37.
- The Dickerson 41 is heavier, displacing about 54% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Dickerson 41 carries the more powerful rig (14.3 vs 14.0), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Dickerson 41 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Dickerson 41 rates better for offshore work (1.72 vs 1.83).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.