Drascombe Lugger vs West Wight Potter 19
How do the Drascombe Lugger and West Wight Potter 19 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Drascombe Lugger 
West Wight Potter 19 | Drascombe Lugger | West Wight Potter 19 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 18.8 ft5.71 m | 18.8 ft5.71 m |
| Waterline length | 14.5 ft4.42 m | 16.8 ft5.11 m |
| Beam | 6.3 ft1.91 m | 7.5 ft2.29 m |
| Draft | 4.0 ft1.22 m | 3.6 ft1.09 m |
| Displacement | 600 lb272 kg | 1,225 lb556 kg |
| Ballast | 100 lb45 kg | 370 lb168 kg |
| Sail area | 132 ft²12.3 m² | 132 ft²12.3 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 29.69 | 18.45 |
| Displacement / Length | 88 | 116 |
| Comfort ratio | 5.1 | 7.4 |
| Capsize screening | 2.96 | 2.80 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.1 | 5.5 |
Drascombe Lugger vs West Wight Potter 19: the short version
- The Drascombe Lugger and West Wight Potter 19 are close in length (18.8 ft5.71 m vs 18.8 ft5.71 m ).
- The West Wight Potter 19 is heavier, displacing about 104% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Drascombe Lugger carries the more powerful rig (29.7 vs 18.4), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The West Wight Potter 19 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the West Wight Potter 19 rates better for offshore work (2.80 vs 2.96).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.