Etap 21i vs Etap 22
How do the Etap 21i and Etap 22 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Etap 21i | Etap 21i | Etap 22 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 21.5 ft6.56 m | 21.6 ft6.60 m |
| Waterline length | 20.0 ft6.10 m | 18.7 ft5.70 m |
| Beam | 8.2 ft2.49 m | 7.9 ft2.40 m |
| Draft | 2.3 ft0.70 m | 4.1 ft1.25 m |
| Displacement | 2,712 lb1,230 kg | 2,756 lb1,250 kg |
| Ballast | 772 lb350 kg | 1,213 lb550 kg |
| Sail area | 257 ft²23.9 m² | 215 ft²20.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 21.14 | 17.50 |
| Displacement / Length | 151 | 188 |
| Comfort ratio | 12.5 | 13.9 |
| Capsize screening | 2.34 | 2.25 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.0 | 5.8 |
Etap 21i vs Etap 22: the short version
- The Etap 21i and Etap 22 are close in length (21.5 ft6.56 m vs 21.6 ft6.60 m ).
- On sail area/displacement the Etap 21i carries the more powerful rig (21.1 vs 17.5), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Etap 22 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Etap 22 rates better for offshore work (2.25 vs 2.34).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.