Granada 27 vs Hunter 27
How do the Granada 27 and Hunter 27 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Granada 27 
Hunter 27 | Granada 27 | Hunter 27 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 27.2 ft8.28 m | 27.2 ft8.28 m |
| Waterline length | 21.0 ft6.40 m | 22.0 ft6.71 m |
| Beam | 9.1 ft2.78 m | 9.3 ft2.82 m |
| Draft | 5.6 ft1.70 m | 4.3 ft1.30 m |
| Displacement | 4,850 lb2,200 kg | 7,000 lb3,175 kg |
| Ballast | 2,646 lb1,200 kg | 3,000 lb1,361 kg |
| Sail area | 404 ft²37.5 m² | 343 ft²31.9 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 22.56 | 15.00 |
| Displacement / Length | 234 | 293 |
| Comfort ratio | 17.3 | 23.7 |
| Capsize screening | 2.16 | 1.93 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.1 | 6.3 |
| Average used price | €11,000 | — |
Granada 27 vs Hunter 27: the short version
- The Granada 27 and Hunter 27 are close in length (27.2 ft8.28 m vs 27.2 ft8.28 m ).
- The Hunter 27 is heavier, displacing about 44% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Granada 27 carries the more powerful rig (22.6 vs 15.0), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Hunter 27 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Hunter 27 rates better for offshore work (1.93 vs 2.16).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.