Hans Christian 33 vs Hunter 340
How do the Hans Christian 33 and Hunter 340 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Hans Christian 33 | Hans Christian 33 | Hunter 340 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 33.8 ft10.29 m | 33.8 ft10.29 m |
| Waterline length | 29.2 ft8.89 m | 28.6 ft8.71 m |
| Beam | 11.7 ft3.56 m | 11.7 ft3.56 m |
| Draft | 5.5 ft1.68 m | 4.5 ft1.37 m |
| Displacement | 19,000 lb8,618 kg | 11,030 lb5,003 kg |
| Ballast | 6,300 lb2,858 kg | 4,100 lb1,860 kg |
| Sail area | 600 ft²55.7 m² | 599 ft²55.6 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 13.48 | 19.34 |
| Displacement / Length | 342 | 211 |
| Comfort ratio | 36.5 | 21.5 |
| Capsize screening | 1.75 | 2.10 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.2 | 7.2 |
Hans Christian 33 vs Hunter 340: the short version
- The Hans Christian 33 and Hunter 340 are close in length (33.8 ft10.29 m vs 33.8 ft10.29 m ).
- The Hans Christian 33 is heavier, displacing about 72% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Hunter 340 carries the more powerful rig (19.3 vs 13.5), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Hans Christian 33 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Hans Christian 33 rates better for offshore work (1.75 vs 2.10).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.