Herreshoff H-26 vs International 110
How do the Herreshoff H-26 and International 110 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Herreshoff H-26 
International 110 | Herreshoff H-26 | International 110 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 26.3 ft8.02 m | 24.0 ft7.32 m |
| Waterline length | 22.3 ft6.78 m | 18.0 ft5.49 m |
| Beam | 9.0 ft2.74 m | 4.2 ft1.27 m |
| Draft | 3.9 ft1.19 m | 3.0 ft0.91 m |
| Displacement | 6,500 lb2,948 kg | 910 lb413 kg |
| Ballast | 3,000 lb1,361 kg | 300 lb136 kg |
| Sail area | 360 ft²33.4 m² | 157 ft²14.6 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 16.54 | 26.75 |
| Displacement / Length | 263 | 70 |
| Comfort ratio | 22.9 | 10.6 |
| Capsize screening | 1.93 | 1.72 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.3 | 5.7 |
Herreshoff H-26 vs International 110: the short version
- The Herreshoff H-26 is the larger boat at 26.3 ft8.02 m LOA versus 24.0 ft7.32 m for the International 110.
- The Herreshoff H-26 is heavier, displacing about 614% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the International 110 carries the more powerful rig (26.8 vs 16.5), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Herreshoff H-26 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the International 110 rates better for offshore work (1.72 vs 1.93).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.