Hunter 25-2 vs Merit 25
How do the Hunter 25-2 and Merit 25 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Hunter 25-2 
Merit 25 | Hunter 25-2 | Merit 25 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 24.5 ft7.47 m | 24.5 ft7.47 m |
| Waterline length | 22.1 ft6.73 m | 20.0 ft6.10 m |
| Beam | 8.5 ft2.58 m | 8.0 ft2.44 m |
| Draft | 2.0 ft0.61 m | 4.0 ft1.22 m |
| Displacement | 3,700 lb1,678 kg | 2,900 lb1,315 kg |
| Ballast | 1,309 lb594 kg | 1,050 lb476 kg |
| Sail area | 218 ft²20.3 m² | 275 ft²25.5 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 14.58 | 21.64 |
| Displacement / Length | 153 | 162 |
| Comfort ratio | 14.6 | 13.2 |
| Capsize screening | 2.19 | 2.24 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.3 | 6.0 |
Hunter 25-2 vs Merit 25: the short version
- The Hunter 25-2 and Merit 25 are close in length (24.5 ft7.47 m vs 24.5 ft7.47 m ).
- The Hunter 25-2 is heavier, displacing about 28% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Merit 25 carries the more powerful rig (21.6 vs 14.6), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Hunter 25-2 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Hunter 25-2 rates better for offshore work (2.19 vs 2.24).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.