Hurley 22 vs Sonata 6.7
How do the Hurley 22 and Sonata 6.7 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Hurley 22 | Hurley 22 | Sonata 6.7 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 22.0 ft6.70 m | 22.0 ft6.70 m |
| Waterline length | 17.0 ft5.18 m | 19.4 ft5.90 m |
| Beam | 7.3 ft2.22 m | 8.2 ft2.50 m |
| Draft | 3.7 ft1.12 m | 4.9 ft1.50 m |
| Displacement | 3,968 lb1,800 kg | 2,544 lb1,154 kg |
| Ballast | 2,425 lb1,100 kg | 952 lb432 kg |
| Sail area | 296 ft²27.5 m² | 224 ft²20.8 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 18.90 | 19.23 |
| Displacement / Length | 361 | 157 |
| Comfort ratio | 23.6 | 11.8 |
| Capsize screening | 1.84 | 2.40 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.5 | 5.9 |
| Average used price | €2,900 | — |
Hurley 22 vs Sonata 6.7: the short version
- The Hurley 22 and Sonata 6.7 are close in length (22.0 ft6.70 m vs 22.0 ft6.70 m ).
- The Hurley 22 is heavier, displacing about 56% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Sonata 6.7 carries the more powerful rig (19.2 vs 18.9), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Hurley 22 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Hurley 22 rates better for offshore work (1.84 vs 2.40).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.