Magnifik Midget vs Sonar
How do the Magnifik Midget and Sonar compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Magnifik Midget 
Sonar | Magnifik Midget | Sonar | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 23.0 ft7.00 m | 23.0 ft7.00 m |
| Waterline length | 18.9 ft5.75 m | 19.9 ft6.07 m |
| Beam | 7.0 ft2.12 m | 7.9 ft2.40 m |
| Draft | 3.2 ft0.98 m | 3.9 ft1.19 m |
| Displacement | 3,086 lb1,400 kg | 2,100 lb953 kg |
| Ballast | 1,543 lb700 kg | 930 lb422 kg |
| Sail area | 269 ft²25.0 m² | 265 ft²24.6 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 20.31 | 25.86 |
| Displacement / Length | 205 | 119 |
| Comfort ratio | 17.9 | 10.0 |
| Capsize screening | 1.91 | 2.46 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.8 | 6.0 |
| Average used price | €1,200 | — |
Magnifik Midget vs Sonar: the short version
- The Magnifik Midget and Sonar are close in length (23.0 ft7.00 m vs 23.0 ft7.00 m ).
- The Magnifik Midget is heavier, displacing about 47% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Sonar carries the more powerful rig (25.9 vs 20.3), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Magnifik Midget scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Magnifik Midget rates better for offshore work (1.91 vs 2.46).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.