Mistinguette / OE 29 vs Swan 38
How do the Mistinguette / OE 29 and Swan 38 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Mistinguette / OE 29 
Swan 38 | Mistinguette / OE 29 | Swan 38 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 28.7 ft8.76 m | 28.7 ft8.75 m |
| Waterline length | 21.6 ft6.60 m | 28.7 ft8.75 m |
| Beam | 8.7 ft2.66 m | 11.6 ft3.52 m |
| Draft | 4.9 ft1.50 m | 6.6 ft2.00 m |
| Displacement | 6,834 lb3,100 kg | 18,739 lb8,500 kg |
| Ballast | 3,086 lb1,400 kg | 7,100 lb3,221 kg |
| Sail area | 463 ft²43.0 m² | 667 ft²62.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 20.57 | 15.13 |
| Displacement / Length | 301 | 354 |
| Comfort ratio | 24.8 | 38.8 |
| Capsize screening | 1.84 | 1.74 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.2 | 7.2 |
| Average used price | €7,100 | — |
Mistinguette / OE 29 vs Swan 38: the short version
- The Mistinguette / OE 29 and Swan 38 are close in length (28.7 ft8.76 m vs 28.7 ft8.75 m ).
- The Swan 38 is heavier, displacing about 174% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Mistinguette / OE 29 carries the more powerful rig (20.6 vs 15.1), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Swan 38 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Swan 38 rates better for offshore work (1.74 vs 1.84).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.