Nimbus 42 vs Redline 41
How do the Nimbus 42 and Redline 41 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Nimbus 42 | Nimbus 42 | Redline 41 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 41.4 ft12.62 m | 41.4 ft12.62 m |
| Waterline length | 34.2 ft10.42 m | 30.0 ft9.14 m |
| Beam | 12.5 ft3.81 m | 11.2 ft3.40 m |
| Draft | 5.8 ft1.78 m | 6.3 ft1.92 m |
| Displacement | 23,325 lb10,580 kg | 19,475 lb8,834 kg |
| Ballast | 10,000 lb4,536 kg | 9,500 lb4,309 kg |
| Sail area | 854 ft²79.3 m² | 776 ft²72.1 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 16.74 | 17.15 |
| Displacement / Length | 261 | 322 |
| Comfort ratio | 34.3 | 36.2 |
| Capsize screening | 1.75 | 1.66 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.8 | 7.3 |
Nimbus 42 vs Redline 41: the short version
- The Nimbus 42 and Redline 41 are close in length (41.4 ft12.62 m vs 41.4 ft12.62 m ).
- The Nimbus 42 is heavier, displacing about 20% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Redline 41 carries the more powerful rig (17.2 vs 16.7), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Redline 41 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Redline 41 rates better for offshore work (1.66 vs 1.75).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.