Ohlson 29 / Winga 29 vs Ohlson 8.8
How do the Ohlson 29 / Winga 29 and Ohlson 8.8 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Ohlson 29 / Winga 29 | Ohlson 29 / Winga 29 | Ohlson 8.8 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 28.9 ft8.80 m | 28.9 ft8.80 m |
| Waterline length | 22.0 ft6.70 m | 23.9 ft7.30 m |
| Beam | 8.9 ft2.70 m | 9.3 ft2.85 m |
| Draft | 5.3 ft1.60 m | 5.6 ft1.72 m |
| Displacement | 7,275 lb3,300 kg | 7,937 lb3,600 kg |
| Ballast | 2,866 lb1,300 kg | 2,646 lb1,200 kg |
| Sail area | 355 ft²33.0 m² | 355 ft²33.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 15.13 | 14.28 |
| Displacement / Length | 306 | 258 |
| Comfort ratio | 25.6 | 24.6 |
| Capsize screening | 1.83 | 1.87 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.3 | 6.6 |
| Average used price | €6,500 | €7,900 |
Ohlson 29 / Winga 29 vs Ohlson 8.8: the short version
- The Ohlson 29 / Winga 29 and Ohlson 8.8 are close in length (28.9 ft8.80 m vs 28.9 ft8.80 m ).
- The Ohlson 8.8 is heavier, displacing about 9% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Ohlson 29 / Winga 29 carries the more powerful rig (15.1 vs 14.3), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Ohlson 29 / Winga 29 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Ohlson 29 / Winga 29 rates better for offshore work (1.83 vs 1.87).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.