Pearson Electra vs Triton 25
How do the Pearson Electra and Triton 25 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Pearson Electra | Pearson Electra | Triton 25 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 22.5 ft6.86 m | 25.0 ft7.62 m |
| Waterline length | 16.8 ft5.11 m | 21.4 ft6.53 m |
| Beam | 7.0 ft2.13 m | 8.0 ft2.44 m |
| Draft | 3.0 ft0.91 m | 4.3 ft1.30 m |
| Displacement | 3,000 lb1,361 kg | 3,750 lb1,701 kg |
| Ballast | 1,299 lb589 kg | 1,250 lb567 kg |
| Sail area | 228 ft²21.2 m² | 257 ft²23.9 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 17.54 | 17.04 |
| Displacement / Length | 285 | 170 |
| Comfort ratio | 18.8 | 16.1 |
| Capsize screening | 1.94 | 2.06 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.5 | 6.2 |
Pearson Electra vs Triton 25: the short version
- The Triton 25 is the larger boat at 25.0 ft7.62 m LOA versus 22.5 ft6.86 m for the Pearson Electra.
- The Triton 25 is heavier, displacing about 25% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Pearson Electra carries the more powerful rig (17.5 vs 17.0), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Pearson Electra scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Pearson Electra rates better for offshore work (1.94 vs 2.06).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.