Santana 22 vs Starwind 223
How do the Santana 22 and Starwind 223 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Santana 22 
Starwind 223 | Santana 22 | Starwind 223 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 22.3 ft6.78 m | 22.3 ft6.78 m |
| Waterline length | 18.8 ft5.71 m | 19.3 ft5.89 m |
| Beam | 7.5 ft2.29 m | 8.5 ft2.59 m |
| Draft | 3.5 ft1.07 m | 5.0 ft1.52 m |
| Displacement | 2,600 lb1,179 kg | 2,435 lb1,104 kg |
| Ballast | 1,230 lb558 kg | 700 lb318 kg |
| Sail area | 218 ft²20.3 m² | 221 ft²20.5 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 18.45 | 19.54 |
| Displacement / Length | 176 | 151 |
| Comfort ratio | 13.9 | 10.8 |
| Capsize screening | 2.18 | 2.53 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Santana 22 vs Starwind 223: the short version
- The Santana 22 and Starwind 223 are close in length (22.3 ft6.78 m vs 22.3 ft6.78 m ).
- On sail area/displacement the Starwind 223 carries the more powerful rig (19.5 vs 18.4), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Santana 22 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Santana 22 rates better for offshore work (2.18 vs 2.53).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.