Semona 30 vs Vindo 30
How do the Semona 30 and Vindo 30 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Semona 30 | Semona 30 | Vindo 30 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 29.9 ft9.10 m | 29.9 ft9.10 m |
| Waterline length | 23.0 ft7.00 m | 23.3 ft7.10 m |
| Beam | 9.7 ft2.95 m | 8.0 ft2.45 m |
| Draft | 4.3 ft1.30 m | 4.3 ft1.30 m |
| Displacement | 7,055 lb3,200 kg | 7,716 lb3,500 kg |
| Ballast | 3,307 lb1,500 kg | 3,086 lb1,400 kg |
| Sail area | 344 ft²32.0 m² | 463 ft²43.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 14.96 | 18.97 |
| Displacement / Length | 260 | 273 |
| Comfort ratio | 21.2 | 29.4 |
| Capsize screening | 2.02 | 1.63 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.4 | 6.5 |
| Average used price | €3,900 | €7,000 |
Semona 30 vs Vindo 30: the short version
- The Semona 30 and Vindo 30 are close in length (29.9 ft9.10 m vs 29.9 ft9.10 m ).
- The Vindo 30 is heavier, displacing about 9% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Vindo 30 carries the more powerful rig (19.0 vs 15.0), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Vindo 30 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Vindo 30 rates better for offshore work (1.63 vs 2.02).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.