Swan 100 vs Swan 62
How do the Swan 100 and Swan 62 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Swan 100 
Swan 62 | Swan 100 | Swan 62 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 86.8 ft26.46 m | 52.2 ft15.90 m |
| Waterline length | 86.8 ft26.46 m | 52.2 ft15.90 m |
| Beam | 23.2 ft7.06 m | 17.5 ft5.34 m |
| Draft | 13.2 ft4.02 m | 9.8 ft3.00 m |
| Displacement | 158,733 lb72,000 kg | 62,832 lb28,500 kg |
| Ballast | 63,934 lb29,000 kg | 24,692 lb11,200 kg |
| Sail area | 4,947 ft²459.6 m² | 2,392 ft²222.2 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 27.00 | 24.22 |
| Displacement / Length | 108 | 198 |
| Comfort ratio | 43.1 | 41.1 |
| Capsize screening | 1.71 | 1.76 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 12.5 | 9.7 |
Swan 100 vs Swan 62: the short version
- The Swan 100 is the larger boat at 86.8 ft26.46 m LOA versus 52.2 ft15.90 m for the Swan 62.
- The Swan 100 is heavier, displacing about 153% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Swan 100 carries the more powerful rig (27.0 vs 24.2), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Swan 100 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Swan 100 rates better for offshore work (1.71 vs 1.76).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.