Swan 36 Frers vs Swan 43 Holland
How do the Swan 36 Frers and Swan 43 Holland compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Swan 36 Frers 
Swan 43 Holland | Swan 36 Frers | Swan 43 Holland | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 29.7 ft9.06 m | 34.1 ft10.40 m |
| Waterline length | 29.7 ft9.06 m | 34.1 ft10.40 m |
| Beam | 12.0 ft3.65 m | 13.1 ft4.00 m |
| Draft | 6.9 ft2.11 m | 8.2 ft2.50 m |
| Displacement | 14,771 lb6,700 kg | 23,369 lb10,600 kg |
| Ballast | 5,600 lb2,540 kg | 9,040 lb4,100 kg |
| Sail area | 624 ft²58.0 m² | 879 ft²81.7 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 16.58 | 17.21 |
| Displacement / Length | 251 | 263 |
| Comfort ratio | 28.1 | 34.3 |
| Capsize screening | 1.95 | 1.84 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.3 | 7.8 |
Swan 36 Frers vs Swan 43 Holland: the short version
- The Swan 43 Holland is the larger boat at 34.1 ft10.40 m LOA versus 29.7 ft9.06 m for the Swan 36 Frers.
- The Swan 43 Holland is heavier, displacing about 58% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Swan 43 Holland carries the more powerful rig (17.2 vs 16.6), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Swan 43 Holland scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Swan 43 Holland rates better for offshore work (1.84 vs 1.95).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.