Wilderness 38 vs Wilderness 40
How do the Wilderness 38 and Wilderness 40 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Wilderness 38 | Wilderness 38 | Wilderness 40 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 38.3 ft11.66 m | 40.0 ft12.19 m |
| Waterline length | 30.0 ft9.14 m | 32.0 ft9.75 m |
| Beam | 12.0 ft3.66 m | 12.0 ft3.66 m |
| Draft | 6.5 ft1.98 m | 6.5 ft1.98 m |
| Displacement | 9,000 lb4,082 kg | 9,000 lb4,082 kg |
| Ballast | 4,500 lb2,041 kg | 3,969 lb1,800 kg |
| Sail area | 596 ft²55.4 m² | 597 ft²55.5 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 22.04 | 22.08 |
| Displacement / Length | 149 | 123 |
| Comfort ratio | 15.6 | 14.8 |
| Capsize screening | 2.31 | 2.31 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.3 | 7.6 |
Wilderness 38 vs Wilderness 40: the short version
- The Wilderness 40 is the larger boat at 40.0 ft12.19 m LOA versus 38.3 ft11.66 m for the Wilderness 38.
- On sail area/displacement the Wilderness 40 carries the more powerful rig (22.1 vs 22.0), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Wilderness 38 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Wilderness 40 rates better for offshore work (2.31 vs 2.31).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.