Abbott 33 vs Beneteau Figaro 2
How do the Abbott 33 and Beneteau Figaro 2 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Abbott 33 
Beneteau Figaro 2 | Abbott 33 | Beneteau Figaro 2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 33.3 ft10.15 m | 33.3 ft10.15 m |
| Waterline length | 26.9 ft8.21 m | 32.1 ft9.80 m |
| Beam | 8.2 ft2.50 m | 11.3 ft3.43 m |
| Draft | 5.4 ft1.65 m | 7.0 ft2.15 m |
| Displacement | 6,057 lb2,747 kg | 6,680 lb3,030 kg |
| Ballast | 3,304 lb1,499 kg | 2,447 lb1,110 kg |
| Sail area | 432 ft²40.1 m² | 792 ft²73.6 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 20.80 | 35.73 |
| Displacement / Length | 139 | 90 |
| Comfort ratio | 19.7 | 12.6 |
| Capsize screening | 1.80 | 2.39 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.0 | 7.6 |
Abbott 33 vs Beneteau Figaro 2: the short version
- The Abbott 33 and Beneteau Figaro 2 are close in length (33.3 ft10.15 m vs 33.3 ft10.15 m ).
- The Beneteau Figaro 2 is heavier, displacing about 10% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Beneteau Figaro 2 carries the more powerful rig (35.7 vs 20.8), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Abbott 33 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Abbott 33 rates better for offshore work (1.80 vs 2.39).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.