Beneteau 323 vs Beneteau Figaro 2
How do the Beneteau 323 and Beneteau Figaro 2 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Beneteau 323 
Beneteau Figaro 2 | Beneteau 323 | Beneteau Figaro 2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 32.8 ft10.01 m | 33.3 ft10.15 m |
| Waterline length | 29.2 ft8.89 m | 32.1 ft9.80 m |
| Beam | 10.8 ft3.28 m | 11.3 ft3.43 m |
| Draft | 4.8 ft1.45 m | 7.0 ft2.15 m |
| Displacement | 9,325 lb4,230 kg | 6,680 lb3,030 kg |
| Ballast | 2,414 lb1,095 kg | 2,447 lb1,110 kg |
| Sail area | 542 ft²50.4 m² | 792 ft²73.6 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 19.57 | 35.73 |
| Displacement / Length | 168 | 90 |
| Comfort ratio | 20.1 | 12.6 |
| Capsize screening | 2.04 | 2.39 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.2 | 7.6 |
Beneteau 323 vs Beneteau Figaro 2: the short version
- The Beneteau 323 and Beneteau Figaro 2 are close in length (32.8 ft10.01 m vs 33.3 ft10.15 m ).
- The Beneteau 323 is heavier, displacing about 40% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Beneteau Figaro 2 carries the more powerful rig (35.7 vs 19.6), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Beneteau 323 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Beneteau 323 rates better for offshore work (2.04 vs 2.39).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.