Achilles 24 vs Buccaneer 240
How do the Achilles 24 and Buccaneer 240 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Achilles 24 | Achilles 24 | Buccaneer 240 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 23.8 ft7.24 m | 23.7 ft7.21 m |
| Waterline length | 19.5 ft5.94 m | 20.3 ft6.20 m |
| Beam | 7.1 ft2.16 m | 8.0 ft2.44 m |
| Draft | 3.8 ft1.14 m | 2.5 ft0.76 m |
| Displacement | 2,600 lb1,179 kg | 4,000 lb1,814 kg |
| Ballast | 1,314 lb596 kg | 1,250 lb567 kg |
| Sail area | 210 ft²19.5 m² | 220 ft²20.4 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 17.77 | 13.97 |
| Displacement / Length | 157 | 213 |
| Comfort ratio | 14.2 | 18.2 |
| Capsize screening | 2.06 | 2.02 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.9 | 6.0 |
Achilles 24 vs Buccaneer 240: the short version
- The Achilles 24 and Buccaneer 240 are close in length (23.8 ft7.24 m vs 23.7 ft7.21 m ).
- The Buccaneer 240 is heavier, displacing about 54% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Achilles 24 carries the more powerful rig (17.8 vs 14.0), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Buccaneer 240 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Buccaneer 240 rates better for offshore work (2.02 vs 2.06).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.