Buccaneer 240 vs Eastward Ho 24
How do the Buccaneer 240 and Eastward Ho 24 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Buccaneer 240 | Buccaneer 240 | Eastward Ho 24 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 23.7 ft7.21 m | 23.7 ft7.21 m |
| Waterline length | 20.3 ft6.20 m | 20.0 ft6.10 m |
| Beam | 8.0 ft2.44 m | 8.7 ft2.64 m |
| Draft | 2.5 ft0.76 m | 3.8 ft1.17 m |
| Displacement | 4,000 lb1,814 kg | 7,000 lb3,175 kg |
| Ballast | 1,250 lb567 kg | 3,000 lb1,361 kg |
| Sail area | 220 ft²20.4 m² | 301 ft²28.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 13.97 | 13.16 |
| Displacement / Length | 213 | 391 |
| Comfort ratio | 18.2 | 28.9 |
| Capsize screening | 2.02 | 1.81 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.0 | 6.0 |
Buccaneer 240 vs Eastward Ho 24: the short version
- The Buccaneer 240 and Eastward Ho 24 are close in length (23.7 ft7.21 m vs 23.7 ft7.21 m ).
- The Eastward Ho 24 is heavier, displacing about 75% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Buccaneer 240 carries the more powerful rig (14.0 vs 13.2), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Eastward Ho 24 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Eastward Ho 24 rates better for offshore work (1.81 vs 2.02).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.