Alberg 22 vs D&M 22
How do the Alberg 22 and D&M 22 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Alberg 22 
D&M 22 | Alberg 22 | D&M 22 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 22.0 ft6.71 m | 22.0 ft6.71 m |
| Waterline length | 16.0 ft4.88 m | 18.8 ft5.71 m |
| Beam | 7.0 ft2.13 m | 8.4 ft2.57 m |
| Draft | 3.1 ft0.94 m | 5.5 ft1.68 m |
| Displacement | 3,200 lb1,451 kg | 2,775 lb1,259 kg |
| Ballast | 1,540 lb699 kg | 1,000 lb454 kg |
| Sail area | 235 ft²21.8 m² | 254 ft²23.6 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 17.31 | 20.58 |
| Displacement / Length | 349 | 188 |
| Comfort ratio | 20.8 | 12.7 |
| Capsize screening | 1.90 | 2.40 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.4 | 5.8 |
Alberg 22 vs D&M 22: the short version
- The Alberg 22 and D&M 22 are close in length (22.0 ft6.71 m vs 22.0 ft6.71 m ).
- The Alberg 22 is heavier, displacing about 15% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the D&M 22 carries the more powerful rig (20.6 vs 17.3), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Alberg 22 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Alberg 22 rates better for offshore work (1.90 vs 2.40).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.