Alberg 22 vs Laminex Pocket Rocket
How do the Alberg 22 and Laminex Pocket Rocket compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Alberg 22 
Laminex Pocket Rocket | Alberg 22 | Laminex Pocket Rocket | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 22.0 ft6.71 m | 22.0 ft6.71 m |
| Waterline length | 16.0 ft4.88 m | 21.5 ft6.55 m |
| Beam | 7.0 ft2.13 m | 9.5 ft2.90 m |
| Draft | 3.1 ft0.94 m | 5.0 ft1.52 m |
| Displacement | 3,200 lb1,451 kg | 2,400 lb1,089 kg |
| Ballast | 1,540 lb699 kg | 1,100 lb499 kg |
| Sail area | 235 ft²21.8 m² | 258 ft²24.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 17.31 | 23.03 |
| Displacement / Length | 349 | 108 |
| Comfort ratio | 20.8 | 8.5 |
| Capsize screening | 1.90 | 2.84 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.4 | 6.2 |
Alberg 22 vs Laminex Pocket Rocket: the short version
- The Alberg 22 and Laminex Pocket Rocket are close in length (22.0 ft6.71 m vs 22.0 ft6.71 m ).
- The Alberg 22 is heavier, displacing about 33% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Laminex Pocket Rocket carries the more powerful rig (23.0 vs 17.3), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Alberg 22 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Alberg 22 rates better for offshore work (1.90 vs 2.84).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.