Albin 78 Cirrus vs Albin 79
How do the Albin 78 Cirrus and Albin 79 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Albin 78 Cirrus 
Albin 79 | Albin 78 Cirrus | Albin 79 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 25.6 ft7.80 m | 25.9 ft7.90 m |
| Waterline length | 21.8 ft6.65 m | 20.0 ft6.10 m |
| Beam | 9.1 ft2.76 m | 8.8 ft2.67 m |
| Draft | 4.9 ft1.49 m | 4.6 ft1.40 m |
| Displacement | 5,181 lb2,350 kg | 4,200 lb1,905 kg |
| Ballast | 2,094 lb950 kg | 1,653 lb750 kg |
| Sail area | 281 ft²26.1 m² | 259 ft²24.1 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 15.02 | 15.92 |
| Displacement / Length | 223 | 234 |
| Comfort ratio | 18.5 | 16.6 |
| Capsize screening | 2.09 | 2.17 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.3 | 6.0 |
Albin 78 Cirrus vs Albin 79: the short version
- The Albin 78 Cirrus and Albin 79 are close in length (25.6 ft7.80 m vs 25.9 ft7.90 m ).
- The Albin 78 Cirrus is heavier, displacing about 23% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Albin 79 carries the more powerful rig (15.9 vs 15.0), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Albin 78 Cirrus scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Albin 78 Cirrus rates better for offshore work (2.09 vs 2.17).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.