Albin 78 Cirrus vs Albin Express
How do the Albin 78 Cirrus and Albin Express compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Albin 78 Cirrus 
Albin Express | Albin 78 Cirrus | Albin Express | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 25.6 ft7.80 m | 25.5 ft7.77 m |
| Waterline length | 21.8 ft6.65 m | 21.6 ft6.58 m |
| Beam | 9.1 ft2.76 m | 8.2 ft2.50 m |
| Draft | 4.9 ft1.49 m | 4.8 ft1.45 m |
| Displacement | 5,181 lb2,350 kg | 3,968 lb1,800 kg |
| Ballast | 2,094 lb950 kg | 1,764 lb800 kg |
| Sail area | 281 ft²26.1 m² | 299 ft²27.8 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 15.02 | 19.09 |
| Displacement / Length | 223 | 176 |
| Comfort ratio | 18.5 | 16.3 |
| Capsize screening | 2.09 | 2.07 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.3 | 6.2 |
| Average used price | — | €5,000 |
Albin 78 Cirrus vs Albin Express: the short version
- The Albin 78 Cirrus and Albin Express are close in length (25.6 ft7.80 m vs 25.5 ft7.77 m ).
- The Albin 78 Cirrus is heavier, displacing about 31% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Albin Express carries the more powerful rig (19.1 vs 15.0), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Albin 78 Cirrus scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Albin Express rates better for offshore work (2.07 vs 2.09).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.