Albin 82 MS vs Delta 31
How do the Albin 82 MS and Delta 31 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Albin 82 MS 
Delta 31 | Albin 82 MS | Delta 31 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 29.9 ft9.12 m | 30.7 ft9.35 m |
| Waterline length | 25.0 ft7.62 m | 24.9 ft7.60 m |
| Beam | 9.3 ft2.84 m | 10.0 ft3.04 m |
| Draft | 3.9 ft1.19 m | 5.9 ft1.80 m |
| Displacement | 7,496 lb3,400 kg | 8,598 lb3,900 kg |
| Ballast | 1,984 lb900 kg | 3,505 lb1,590 kg |
| Sail area | 323 ft²30.0 m² | 436 ft²40.5 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 13.49 | 16.62 |
| Displacement / Length | 214 | 248 |
| Comfort ratio | 22.3 | 23.3 |
| Capsize screening | 1.91 | 1.95 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.7 | 6.7 |
Albin 82 MS vs Delta 31: the short version
- The Delta 31 is the larger boat at 30.7 ft9.35 m LOA versus 29.9 ft9.12 m for the Albin 82 MS.
- The Delta 31 is heavier, displacing about 15% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Delta 31 carries the more powerful rig (16.6 vs 13.5), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Delta 31 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Albin 82 MS rates better for offshore work (1.91 vs 1.95).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.