Albin Cumulus vs Pearson Triton
How do the Albin Cumulus and Pearson Triton compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Albin Cumulus | Albin Cumulus | Pearson Triton | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 28.4 ft8.64 m | 28.3 ft8.63 m |
| Waterline length | 22.3 ft6.80 m | 21.5 ft6.55 m |
| Beam | 9.3 ft2.85 m | 8.3 ft2.51 m |
| Draft | 5.3 ft1.60 m | 3.9 ft1.19 m |
| Displacement | 8,157 lb3,700 kg | 6,930 lb3,143 kg |
| Ballast | 2,866 lb1,300 kg | 3,019 lb1,369 kg |
| Sail area | 463 ft²43.0 m² | 371 ft²34.5 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 18.28 | 16.33 |
| Displacement / Length | 328 | 311 |
| Comfort ratio | 26.6 | 27.4 |
| Capsize screening | 1.86 | 1.73 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.3 | 6.2 |
| Average used price | €9,900 | — |
Albin Cumulus vs Pearson Triton: the short version
- The Albin Cumulus and Pearson Triton are close in length (28.4 ft8.64 m vs 28.3 ft8.63 m ).
- The Albin Cumulus is heavier, displacing about 18% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Albin Cumulus carries the more powerful rig (18.3 vs 16.3), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Pearson Triton scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Pearson Triton rates better for offshore work (1.73 vs 1.86).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.