Pearson 28 vs Pearson Triton
How do the Pearson 28 and Pearson Triton compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Pearson 28 
Pearson Triton | Pearson 28 | Pearson Triton | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 28.5 ft8.67 m | 28.3 ft8.63 m |
| Waterline length | 24.5 ft7.46 m | 21.5 ft6.55 m |
| Beam | 9.8 ft3.00 m | 8.3 ft2.51 m |
| Draft | 5.0 ft1.52 m | 3.9 ft1.19 m |
| Displacement | 7,000 lb3,175 kg | 6,930 lb3,143 kg |
| Ballast | 3,530 lb1,601 kg | 3,019 lb1,369 kg |
| Sail area | 392 ft²36.4 m² | 371 ft²34.5 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 17.14 | 16.33 |
| Displacement / Length | 213 | 311 |
| Comfort ratio | 20.1 | 27.4 |
| Capsize screening | 2.06 | 1.73 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.6 | 6.2 |
Pearson 28 vs Pearson Triton: the short version
- The Pearson 28 and Pearson Triton are close in length (28.5 ft8.67 m vs 28.3 ft8.63 m ).
- On sail area/displacement the Pearson 28 carries the more powerful rig (17.1 vs 16.3), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Pearson Triton scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Pearson Triton rates better for offshore work (1.73 vs 2.06).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.