Albin Viggen vs Beneteau First 235
How do the Albin Viggen and Beneteau First 235 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Albin Viggen 
Beneteau First 235 | Albin Viggen | Beneteau First 235 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 23.3 ft7.10 m | 23.3 ft7.11 m |
| Waterline length | 19.7 ft6.00 m | 20.3 ft6.17 m |
| Beam | 7.4 ft2.25 m | 8.2 ft2.49 m |
| Draft | 3.6 ft1.11 m | 3.8 ft1.16 m |
| Displacement | 3,086 lb1,400 kg | 2,826 lb1,282 kg |
| Ballast | 1,323 lb600 kg | 825 lb374 kg |
| Sail area | 291 ft²27.0 m² | 249 ft²23.1 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 21.97 | 19.93 |
| Displacement / Length | 180 | 152 |
| Comfort ratio | 16.0 | 12.6 |
| Capsize screening | 2.03 | 2.31 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.9 | 6.0 |
| Average used price | €2,000 | — |
Albin Viggen vs Beneteau First 235: the short version
- The Albin Viggen and Beneteau First 235 are close in length (23.3 ft7.10 m vs 23.3 ft7.11 m ).
- The Albin Viggen is heavier, displacing about 9% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Albin Viggen carries the more powerful rig (22.0 vs 19.9), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Albin Viggen scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Albin Viggen rates better for offshore work (2.03 vs 2.31).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.