Beneteau First 235 vs Stone Horse
How do the Beneteau First 235 and Stone Horse compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Beneteau First 235 
Stone Horse | Beneteau First 235 | Stone Horse | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 23.3 ft7.11 m | 23.3 ft7.11 m |
| Waterline length | 20.3 ft6.17 m | 18.3 ft5.59 m |
| Beam | 8.2 ft2.49 m | 7.1 ft2.16 m |
| Draft | 3.8 ft1.16 m | 3.5 ft1.07 m |
| Displacement | 2,826 lb1,282 kg | 4,500 lb2,041 kg |
| Ballast | 825 lb374 kg | 2,000 lb907 kg |
| Sail area | 249 ft²23.1 m² | 315 ft²29.3 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 19.93 | 18.49 |
| Displacement / Length | 152 | 326 |
| Comfort ratio | 12.6 | 25.8 |
| Capsize screening | 2.31 | 1.72 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.0 | 5.7 |
Beneteau First 235 vs Stone Horse: the short version
- The Beneteau First 235 and Stone Horse are close in length (23.3 ft7.11 m vs 23.3 ft7.11 m ).
- The Stone Horse is heavier, displacing about 59% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Beneteau First 235 carries the more powerful rig (19.9 vs 18.5), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Stone Horse scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Stone Horse rates better for offshore work (1.72 vs 2.31).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.