Alden 44 vs C&C 44
How do the Alden 44 and C&C 44 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Alden 44 | Alden 44 | C&C 44 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 44.2 ft13.46 m | 44.2 ft13.46 m |
| Waterline length | 34.1 ft10.39 m | 35.3 ft10.74 m |
| Beam | 12.5 ft3.81 m | 13.3 ft4.04 m |
| Draft | 8.8 ft2.67 m | 8.3 ft2.51 m |
| Displacement | 24,500 lb11,113 kg | 20,906 lb9,483 kg |
| Ballast | 10,000 lb4,536 kg | 9,850 lb4,468 kg |
| Sail area | 871 ft²80.9 m² | 924 ft²85.8 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 16.52 | 19.48 |
| Displacement / Length | 276 | 213 |
| Comfort ratio | 35.3 | 27.3 |
| Capsize screening | 1.72 | 1.92 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.8 | 8.0 |
Alden 44 vs C&C 44: the short version
- The Alden 44 and C&C 44 are close in length (44.2 ft13.46 m vs 44.2 ft13.46 m ).
- The Alden 44 is heavier, displacing about 17% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the C&C 44 carries the more powerful rig (19.5 vs 16.5), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Alden 44 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Alden 44 rates better for offshore work (1.72 vs 1.92).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.