Aloha 28 vs Cal 28
How do the Aloha 28 and Cal 28 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Aloha 28 
Cal 28 | Aloha 28 | Cal 28 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 28.0 ft8.53 m | 28.0 ft8.53 m |
| Waterline length | 24.5 ft7.47 m | 22.5 ft6.86 m |
| Beam | 9.4 ft2.87 m | 9.0 ft2.74 m |
| Draft | 4.3 ft1.32 m | 4.5 ft1.37 m |
| Displacement | 6,750 lb3,062 kg | 6,000 lb2,722 kg |
| Ballast | 3,000 lb1,361 kg | 2,200 lb998 kg |
| Sail area | 373 ft²34.7 m² | 352 ft²32.7 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 16.71 | 17.06 |
| Displacement / Length | 205 | 235 |
| Comfort ratio | 20.6 | 20.6 |
| Capsize screening | 1.99 | 1.98 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.6 | 6.4 |
Aloha 28 vs Cal 28: the short version
- The Aloha 28 and Cal 28 are close in length (28.0 ft8.53 m vs 28.0 ft8.53 m ).
- The Aloha 28 is heavier, displacing about 13% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Cal 28 carries the more powerful rig (17.1 vs 16.7), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Aloha 28 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Cal 28 rates better for offshore work (1.98 vs 1.99).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.