Aloha 28 vs TES 28 Magnam
How do the Aloha 28 and TES 28 Magnam compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Aloha 28 
TES 28 Magnam | Aloha 28 | TES 28 Magnam | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 28.0 ft8.53 m | 28.0 ft8.53 m |
| Waterline length | 24.5 ft7.47 m | 26.0 ft7.92 m |
| Beam | 9.4 ft2.87 m | 9.9 ft3.02 m |
| Draft | 4.3 ft1.32 m | 4.6 ft1.40 m |
| Displacement | 6,750 lb3,062 kg | 6,400 lb2,903 kg |
| Ballast | 3,000 lb1,361 kg | 1,980 lb898 kg |
| Sail area | 373 ft²34.7 m² | 380 ft²35.3 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 16.71 | 17.64 |
| Displacement / Length | 205 | 163 |
| Comfort ratio | 20.6 | 17.5 |
| Capsize screening | 1.99 | 2.14 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.6 | 6.8 |
Aloha 28 vs TES 28 Magnam: the short version
- The Aloha 28 and TES 28 Magnam are close in length (28.0 ft8.53 m vs 28.0 ft8.53 m ).
- On sail area/displacement the TES 28 Magnam carries the more powerful rig (17.6 vs 16.7), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Aloha 28 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Aloha 28 rates better for offshore work (1.99 vs 2.14).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.