Amphibi-Con 25 vs Ericson 25+
How do the Amphibi-Con 25 and Ericson 25+ compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Amphibi-Con 25 | Amphibi-Con 25 | Ericson 25+ | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 25.4 ft7.75 m | 25.4 ft7.75 m |
| Waterline length | 21.7 ft6.61 m | 21.8 ft6.65 m |
| Beam | 7.8 ft2.36 m | 9.3 ft2.82 m |
| Draft | 4.3 ft1.30 m | 4.9 ft1.50 m |
| Displacement | 3,500 lb1,588 kg | 5,000 lb2,268 kg |
| Ballast | 1,100 lb499 kg | 2,000 lb907 kg |
| Sail area | 277 ft²25.7 m² | 326 ft²30.3 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 19.23 | 17.84 |
| Displacement / Length | 154 | 215 |
| Comfort ratio | 15.5 | 17.4 |
| Capsize screening | 2.04 | 2.16 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.2 | 6.3 |
Amphibi-Con 25 vs Ericson 25+: the short version
- The Amphibi-Con 25 and Ericson 25+ are close in length (25.4 ft7.75 m vs 25.4 ft7.75 m ).
- The Ericson 25+ is heavier, displacing about 43% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Amphibi-Con 25 carries the more powerful rig (19.2 vs 17.8), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Ericson 25+ scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Amphibi-Con 25 rates better for offshore work (2.04 vs 2.16).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.