Ericson 25+ vs Ericson 29
How do the Ericson 25+ and Ericson 29 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Ericson 25+ 
Ericson 29 | Ericson 25+ | Ericson 29 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 25.4 ft7.75 m | 28.6 ft8.71 m |
| Waterline length | 21.8 ft6.65 m | 22.0 ft6.71 m |
| Beam | 9.3 ft2.82 m | 9.3 ft2.82 m |
| Draft | 4.9 ft1.50 m | 4.3 ft1.32 m |
| Displacement | 5,000 lb2,268 kg | 8,500 lb3,856 kg |
| Ballast | 2,000 lb907 kg | 3,900 lb1,769 kg |
| Sail area | 326 ft²30.3 m² | 407 ft²37.8 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 17.84 | 15.64 |
| Displacement / Length | 215 | 356 |
| Comfort ratio | 17.4 | 28.3 |
| Capsize screening | 2.16 | 1.81 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.3 | 6.3 |
Ericson 25+ vs Ericson 29: the short version
- The Ericson 29 is the larger boat at 28.6 ft8.71 m LOA versus 25.4 ft7.75 m for the Ericson 25+.
- The Ericson 29 is heavier, displacing about 70% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Ericson 25+ carries the more powerful rig (17.8 vs 15.6), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Ericson 29 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Ericson 29 rates better for offshore work (1.81 vs 2.16).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.